> WS: Why are people defending Sting vs HHH?

WS: Why are people defending Sting vs HHH?

Posted at: 2015-05-07 
The whole match was just a clusterfuck nostalgic-w@nkfest

Because it wasn't bad? Yeah it was a nostalgic whatever you called it, but it was a well done nostalgic whatever you called it. Would some 60 minute epic mano y mano match be better? Probably, but all things considered what we got was better than what we could have got. Sting and HHH are no spring chickens. The finish to the match was not bad at all, the "broken" sledgehammer was put to use after all, Sting got smashed right in the face with the business end, can't argue with that. The interference was just for nostalgia, not to dictate the finish, this is a good thing in my book.

To be fair, this couldn't have been any more than a nostalgia trip match. Sting is too old to do a proper match, which is why the match was slow, because they needed those breaks

Apparently you expected too much Tommy..., it was no different then Hulk Hogan Vs The Rock.

But, That's just this 'Goofy ...' Kissing WWE ... because I'm being paid by them or something.

They had to do something. These guys are old. They can't do the match of 15 years ago that people are dreaming of.

Cause they didn't expect much out of it to begin with idiot

Because your an idiot that thinks it was the worst match ever when in reality it was ok.

more power to them