That match is not ever going to happen simply because Lesnar and Sting are much to far apart in age difference and Brock would be much too physical for a much older Sting.Now if this were 1997 Sting could easily stand up to brock although Brock would still have an advantage Sting could take out Lesnar but not now.
They should just keep Brock away from Sting it's an interesting Idea but on many levels it's not a good one.Wrestlers don't know how it is to get in the ring with Brock until they finally do and Sting would be the kind of guy that could easily be hurt by Lesnar and at his age it's a big risk that WWE shouldn't take.
Brock Lesnar.
He's credible enough since he made Hulk Hogan pass out, defeated The Rock, Ric Flair, Undertaker, Triple H, and John Cena.
It's hard to say both sting and Lesnar are good wrestlers but I'm a bigger sting fan so I would have to say sting
Brock Lesnar....!!
I will say Sting because I'm a big fan of his but a loss like that would damage Lesnar's aura.
Sting has a habit of punching above his weight. If it's not a real fight, then he might well get the win.
If it is, then he'd better have his baseball bat to hand...
I would say, Sting would win.
The answer is clear: the reigning, defending, undisputed WWE heavyweight champion of the world........BRRRRRRock LeSSSSSSnaar!
hhahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5p9JO9J...
Idiot.