He was already a beast in college. He was a football player, and that's pretty apparent when you look at him. He was always outspoken against PED use, and there has never been even a hint of evidence that would question him in that regard.

Bottom line: It's innocent until proven guilty.

He was the 1st and only player in the early 2000's wanted testing done. He was the only one who was willing to speak to congress when everyone else had to be forced to show up.

And unlike Bonds, Mcgwire & Sosa who got smaller again once they was off the PEDs, Thomas is still a Big Guy even though he doesn't workout and train like he used to.

Because there is zero indication whatsoever that he used, unlike the other two you mentioned.

He was big...he had a FOOTBALL scholarship as a linebacker to Auburn. He's STILL big. He's a BIG GUY.

PED's can help a pitcher a lot. Leg strength is very important, as is arm strength. WHy does it help a hitter more than a pitcher?

Frank Thomas is a good guy. Bonds is useless.

Already big combined with his early stance against PED use... I think he was the only MLB player, period, to talk with the Mitchell Report.

Apparently you haven't been paying attention. I have seen this asked at least five times in the last week alone.

Because there is no evidence of any kind whatsoever that he used? What more can you ask for?

He's clean end if duscussion

He played in the PED era, but since he was already big unlike Bonds no one questions him. Barry Bonds had super hero numbers and Roger Clemens was a great pitcher. How much can PEDs help a pitcher?