This makes a lt is sense to me. Anyone can see the logic in that statement.
If you take away crap from crap you are still left with crap. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand that.
Hi there
If you got two turtles turned them upside down and put them in a box together it would look similar to.
You can fill in the blanks yourself. lol
Best wishes
idai
there is no need to spam this pathetic questions as much as i want to bust a certain person chops with the truth, once is enough
sev that is true lmao. and kw gets an another account deleted for posting his bs lmao
So...here we go round in a circle.
@Kokoro ---but...we do get 2 points for answering.,...
EDIT: And the vicious cycle continues, sir
They keep insisting that MMA is the way to go, and that all TMAs are useless - so useless that TMAs are practically fraudulent. (I guess they want us to believe that all the people here who have claimed to use TMA successfully in self-defense situations are lying or something.) The MMA fanboys keep posting rants here about the alleged practicality of MMA in real-world situations and the equally alleged fraudulent nature of TMAs in those same settings, without giving any evidence to back up their claims.
Do MMA fanboys have some explaining to do as a result of that? After all, I once read someone's answer here on a MMA question, and this person pointed out that if TMAs are crap, then MMA must be too, since MMA is based on TMAs (since, after all, if you take crap and remove the best part of it, what you've taken out is still crap, no matter how much you try to claim otherwise).
