> Brock Lesnars prized fighter gimmick is unrealistic?

Brock Lesnars prized fighter gimmick is unrealistic?

Posted at: 2015-05-07 
This guy has been away from competition for over 3 years is damn near old and got owned in his last two fights before leaving. It's safe to say that after a few years of not competing ring rust takes its tole in a big way so why does everyone still buy this prized fighter gimmick?

The prize gimmick is an excuse people make for lesnar not being there every week, tell me what is more entertaining to watch, Heyman talking about lesnar every week, or lesnar kicking everyone's asses.

Because 97.7% of wrestling fans live in the past. Just look at all the matches they want to see. It's all about guys fro 10-15-20 years ago.

if you think lesnar is unrealistic then what is your opinion on Undertaker who ONLY shows up once a year for a paycheck?

no- it is jarringly realistic in a unrealistic fictional universe. Look how often MMA fighters and boxers defend titles.

Welp what is realistic is Brock Lensar would tear everybody apart on that roster no matter how many years away he was, so i would say hardly.

he could kick your *** I bet. and he can really beat people up. just because hes not undefeated and lost. does not mean hes not a prized fighter. think about what you are saying....

I don't see a prolem

no