> Do you agree is WSOF better than Bellator?

Do you agree is WSOF better than Bellator?

Posted at: 2014-09-13 
In your opinon, are fighters of World Series of Fighting better than fighters of Belattor?

No, not on the whole. I think in general they're pretty interchangeable, insofar as how their overall skill is. Bellator actually probably has a better collection of fighters simply because it has a larger roster. There are more "UFC-ready" fighters in Bellator than in WSOF. Right now, WSOF is making their money off of UFC cast-offs who are on the down-side of their career. Palhares is the only one who immediately comes to mind that has a long career ahead of him at the top of his skills. Meanwhile, in Bellator, you have Alvarez, the Freire brothers, Michael Chandler, Mo Lawal, Blagio Ivanov, Marcine Held, Rick Hawn, Pat Curran, Eduardo Dantas, and more. While not all of them would immediately be top-10 in the UFC, a LOT of them would, and I could see some as champions. WSOF just doesn't have that kind of talent up and down their roster.

And frankly, WSOF doesn't have a women's division worth talking about. The UFC and Invicta are really the only promotions where womens matches make a difference. Having Jessica Aguilar is cool, but she's a big fish in a tiny, tiny pond, and not really relevant to the discussion.

In your opinon, are fighters of World Series of Fighting better than fighters of Belattor?